Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: 7 billion people day
-
10-31-2011, 04:24 PM #1
7 billion people day
what number where you?
BBC News - 7 billion people and you: What's your number?"Everyday as your walking down the street, everybody that you met has an original point of view" -Arthur PBS
Imagine - Wife of 18 years to Hubby
Mom to Buddy (son 15) and Little Miss ( daughter 11)
-
10-31-2011, 08:24 PM #2
Interesting - thanks!
2012: The Year Of The Purge!
UPDATED: MAY 15/12
2012 FLING - 673/2012 | COUPON SAVINGS $178.93
EMERGENCY FUND #2 - $510.78 | VACATION FUND - $513.58 | CHANGE JAR $222.51
-
11-01-2011, 10:09 AM #3
wow I'm #2,833,979,865th and now there is over 7000000000. Thats a lot of people born in my 55 years.
FernYes I'm out of my mind. It's a dark and scary place in there.
-
11-01-2011, 12:58 PM #4
I read an article in the WSJ that said our population is actually expanding a lot slower than we expected and that most previous estimates for population growth have been way too high. Apparently economic development slows population growth, so birth rates slow down as more communities are lifted out of poverty.
~Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.~
~The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.~
-
11-01-2011, 01:11 PM #5
-
11-01-2011, 01:38 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Colorado
- Posts
- 7,918
- Post Thanks / WTG / Hug

- Blog Entries
- 8
- Rep Power
- 42
~I think it's pretty neat and very strange that we are living in the century of what may be the peak of population on Earth. The population growth rate is declining and at some point in the next 50-100 years the population should actually start to shrink as the aged population dies off. Of course, this is assuming the growth rate stays low or goes lower.
Maybe 500 years from now it will be bizarre to read about how concerned we all were about overpopulation and what is was like living as densely as we do now.~~Constance
~DH
~DS 9
~DD 7
~DD 1 
2012 FLING: 1706 OUT, 293 IN
MENU PLANNING:4/52
BLOG POSTS: 3/30
BOOKS READ:24
-
11-01-2011, 05:18 PM #7Master Dollar Stretcher
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 16,164
- Post Thanks / WTG / Hug

- Blog Entries
- 427
- Rep Power
- 82
It was a little sad for me, listening to the news this morning. I guess number 7 billion is a little girl born in a poor area of India. They say the likelihood of her surviving her childhood is bleak, and if she does, she is still probably destined for a life of abject poverty. Symbolically, she is the most important person on earth right now, but realistically, she'll probably die in anonymity like the rest of us.
DH aka Mad Hen
(http://mad-hen-creations.blogspot.com/)
June no-spend: 0/15
June wasted money: $0
June grocery: $0/400
2012 LAPAW: 8.8/20
2012 Get-Thee-To-The-Gym Challenge: 7/52
: 1136/66,795
Run/walk challenge: 91/520 miles
Total debt (with mortgage, HELOC, and 1 cc): Jan 2012: $285,105 (Jan 2011: $292,750)
(2911 days until retirement)
Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever. Mahatma Gandhi
-
11-02-2011, 10:35 AM #8
-
11-02-2011, 10:48 AM #9
Honestly, I am disgusted that we have become so numerous. It serves absolutely no positive purpose. All we are doing is destroying the planet and other species. (I've read all the arguments that it's not the number of people but the energy use of the rich nations, etc., but it doesn't change the fact that 7 billion people need to be fed and that takes space and energy, period.)
It really makes me sad / sick to my stomach. National Geographic is running a year-long series on the issue and the articles are absolutely heartbreaking.
It's not a small part of why I decided never to have children.
That said, that was a really cool site! Thanks for posting.My Brand-New Blog: http://homeingreece.wordpress.com
Weeks Staying On Budget: 80
-
11-02-2011, 03:04 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Canadian prairies
- Posts
- 11,671
- Post Thanks / WTG / Hug

- Blog Entries
- 5
- Rep Power
- 48
I'm 2,997,459,851st. Amazing that 4 Billion more have been borne since I have been. I say let's make a push into those high birth rate countries and educate them. Lift them from their poverty then, if that's what it takes. My own children have decided to not have children. I'm sad I won't have any grandchildren. But on the other hand, I can understand their reasoning.
2012 Challenges
Use it up Challenge
20 Wishes Challenge: 1/20
Lose-a-pound-a-week Challenge: 24/52 (since spring 2011)
-
11-02-2011, 03:08 PM #11
It has been said that the increase is not from high birth rates but from higher survival rates.
More babies are surviving infancy and more adults are surviving into old age while old age keep moving longer and longer.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-15445092"Everyday as your walking down the street, everybody that you met has an original point of view" -Arthur PBS
Imagine - Wife of 18 years to Hubby
Mom to Buddy (son 15) and Little Miss ( daughter 11)
-
11-02-2011, 05:33 PM #12
I'm #2,733,906,686. When I was in school, the world population was 3.5 billion. Now it's double that. That is a scary thought.
They estimate that the world can sustainably provide for about 2 billion.
Similar Threads
-
7 billion people
By Greebo in forum General ChatReplies: 17Last Post: 02-25-2012, 02:24 PM -
What Congress Bought Itself With Your $1 Billion
By NikoSan999 in forum General ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 07-24-2010, 03:27 PM -
hmmm how much is a billion?
By Russ in forum General ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 07-15-2008, 02:48 PM -
Don't buy Pepsi to win billion
By Kimmomo3 in forum General ChatReplies: 7Last Post: 05-10-2003, 11:38 PM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote

Bookmarks