Why cancer comes back following chemotherapy, radiation or surgery

[COUNTRYBUMPKIN]

http://www.naturalnews.com/z021967.html
One of the most common problems in cancer patients who choose to undergo conventional cancer therapy is recurrence. They might think they have beaten their cancer with chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, only to find a few years later that tumors have spread into other tissues -- usually the lungs, brain, or even the reproductive organs. Conventional medicine has not yet caught on to what's happening here, but the reason why this phenomenon occurs is quite simple: Conventional cancer treatments only treat the symptoms of cancer (tumors or growths) and do not actually do anything to help the patient regain a level of health necessary to keep cancer in check.

A tumor is not technically a disease. It is a symptom of an underlying imbalance in the patient. Unless you treat and reverse the underlying imbalances, you will never eliminate the underlying cause of the cancer. You will continue to see more tumors and complications, even if you are able to treat the first tumors.

Think of it like this: suppose you have a dam holding up a body of water such as a lake. One day, due to poor maintenance, the dam begins to crack and water starts leaking through. In the world of conventional cancer treatment, they would say the problem is the water, and they would begin treating the water. They would try to evaporate the water or eliminate the water from flooding the valley below. But the problem isn't the water leaking through the dam; the problem is the integrity of the dam itself. Unless you diagnose the problem with the dam and repair it, then you will never stop the leaking water.

[Frugal Nurse]

That's a great analogy.

I don't understand why the medical societies haven't caught on to it.
Wait!!! I DO know!

I don't know if people on this forum know - I do research.
I research the cause and effect of certain things on particular topics. There are several I am doing concurrently.
Two studies are HIGHLY funded by drug companies.

Anyway, my point is this - the 'natural- human' side of caring does NOT have the funding for adequate research.
It takes money to research.
I would do it- and at a VERY reduced cost because I am passionate about it, but I can't expend my own money for the necessary supplies, equipment and resources. I need to be situated in a research facility - such as where I am. This hospital will require me to apply for grants to gain the funding I need.
I can't get funding enough to cover the need.

So, then... here's what happens. Doctors, surgeons, nurses etc are REQUIRED to practice based on scientific fact. That's research based and proven in grounded theory.

That is what they are covered for - should a lawsuit occur.

FDA is a BIG funder. HUGE! But they are only funding investigational devices and drugs (in a medical facility- at least).

National Institute of Health is another BIG funder - and possibly could get funding there - but not enough.

This big old hospital does MEDICAL research. Big contradiction should I prove that their medical interventions just don't work.


So... I stay--------- walking proof.