Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User COUNTRYBUMPKIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,021
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    16

    Default Splenda is not so Splendid!

    SPLENDA IS NOT SPLENDID!
    By James Bowen, M.D. (c) 2003
    Web Site: http://www.bowendrjim.com
    E-Mail: jim@bowendrjim.com

    http://www.wnho.net/splenda.htm

    In a simple word you would just as soon have DDT in your food as
    Splenda, because sucralose is a chlorocarbon. The chlorocarbons have
    long been famous for causing organ, genetic, and reproductive
    damage. It should be no surprise, therefore, that the testing of
    sucralose, even at less than the level demanded by FDA rules,
    reveals that it has been shown to cause up to 40%shrinkage of the
    thymus: A gland that is the very foundation of our immune system. It
    also causes swelling of the liver and kidneys, and CALCIFICATION of
    the kidney.

    Lying and deceit on the artificial sweetener issue has been the
    FDA's Modus Operandi ever since Donald Rummsfeld broke everything
    decent in the US government to put Aspartame on the market as
    a "contract on humanity". It has no commercial purpose other than a
    contract on humanity. Either they have done but little testing of
    sucralose, or they are so afraid of what the public would think of
    sucralose, and the government if the public but knew what was going
    on, that they will not tell us! BECAUSE: we have been told nothing
    about the extensive studies which would have to have been done if
    very reasonable, and scientifically sound FDA rules had been
    followed.


    Such study results as have been made known, catches the company in
    great big whopper lies! When questioned about the Thymus shrinkage
    which would disqualify sucralose forever, by the FDA's own rules,
    the company merely said. "Well the rats wouldn't eat the food with
    sucralose in it, so the thymus lost weight from starvation." The FDA
    allowed that explanation even though it was an admission that the
    rats hadn't ingested the required amount of sucralose, but had
    demonstrated immense damage anyway! In fact, if research animals
    won't voluntarily eat the required dose of experimental substance it
    can be given by gastric gavage, which is a common and well-known
    research method. Moreover, the rats so fed were only 7-20%
    underweight Vs the average for the control group. Rats who
    are severely starved to create a 30% weight loss, only shrink their
    thymus by an average of 7%. The net conclusion from all this is,
    that both the thymus shrinkage and the growth retardation caused by
    sucralose were enough to in each case disqualify sucralose from the
    marketplace.
    All of these KNOWN findings only pointed out that the testing was so flawed that it could never be used as a basis for approval on one hand, and that the effects which were detected anyway were so severe that sucralose should never be allowed into the human body. It should be classified right along with DDT, and dioxin as illegal to even release into the environment much less put into your body!

    The company blandly and heinously denied that sucralose is a chlorocarbon. They stated that it was merely a salt, like sodium chloride! That whopper wouldn't even get past a sophomore chemistry student. Facts, and concern for human welfare are obviously irrelevant in our Bush dominated government, and the Rummsfeld dominated media. What their incredulously lying statements about what sucralose is, did bring to mind though, is that it flies in the face of what its known breakdown product , 1, 6, dichloro, fructose, is: Another highly toxic chlorocarbon. They admittedly did not do toxicity studies on it, as FDA rules require, or perhaps the findings were so dangerous that they felt it better to confess to the "minor omission", of not even complying with the law and doing the required studies! They further tried to side step the toxicity issue by saying "Sucralose is not even absorbed from the digestive tract anyway, because it is after all, a chlorocarbon.": Another bold faced lie. Chlorocarbons are significantly absorbed from the digestive tract and sucralose is no exception! It is significantly absorbed from the GI tract. Of course, at that point their lies had compounded and contradicted themselves.

    What you need to know about sucralose is that it is of a class of compounds which places it amongst some of the most dangerous chemicals on earth. The known studies, and science verify this fact. Lies and dissimulations, which have been totally, and inexcusably left unchecked by the FDA, point to gross governmental/corporate corruption, and massive cover up and peril. They say "Oh, It's just made from sugar, what could be more natural and harmless."

    Sincerely,

    Dr. Jim Bowen



  2. #2
    Registered User pqb52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Seneca, New York
    Age
    65
    Posts
    389
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Thanks COUNTRYBUMPKIN, i'll have to talk to my diabetic instructor, she told me to get Splenda for baking

  3. #3
    Master Dollar Stretcher dz_blonde_girl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    SW Iowa
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,216
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    You can't please all the people.........

    Whatever became of all things in moderation?

  4. #4
    KimBob
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    10,052
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    21

    Default

    Originally posted by karlisangel
    For those who aren't I think good ole' sugar is the most natural and the best

    There are far better/more natural choices than sugar! Regular sugar is horrible.

  5. #5
    Registered User COUNTRYBUMPKIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,021
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Stevia is great, but can only be purchased at a natural health food store. Quiltermom, you are right about processed sugar! It is very hard on the body. When I bake, I use orgainc cane syrup, maple syrup or stevia. Sometimes I will use sucanat as well. But I will never ever touch the splenda


  6. #6
    Registered User COUNTRYBUMPKIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,021
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Carolyn, Stevia is great for baking! Here is a website that may be of help to you. And remember, you can only buy it in natural health food stores or online.

    http://www.steviasmart.com/hartofinin.html

  7. #7
    Registered User COUNTRYBUMPKIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,021
    Post Thanks / WTG / Hug
    Rep Power
    16

    Default

    Medicinal Indications of Stevia
    Stevia stabilizes blood sugar levels


    People have consumed Stevia for centuries with no known side effects. Individuals who can not tolerate sugar or other sweeteners can use Stevia. Studies suggest that Stevia has a regulating effect on the pancreas and could help stabilize blood sugar levels in the body, therefore making it wise for people with diabetes, hypoglycemia, and Candidiasis. Traditionally it is indicated as a cardiotonic, anti-gas, for obesity, to reduce acidity (heart burn), hypertension, and to lower uric acid levels. Research also suggest that Stevia may help fight bacteria. It is considered an effective medicine to help in the maintenance of a "perfect health balance".

    In regard to its sweetening power, it is estimated that 30 ml (1 oz) of Stevia extract is equivalent to 3 Kg (6.6 lbs) of sucrose. One pound of our white Stevia extract powder will do the same sweetening as 300 pounds of white sugar.



    http://www.stevia-plant.com/medicinal.cfm

    This article was taken from www.alternative-medicine-message-boards.info You may register for free and scroll down to the diabetics alternative forum

Similar Threads

  1. Splenda Is Not So Splenda
    By COUNTRYBUMPKIN in forum Health and beauty
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-19-2008, 06:36 AM
  2. A Thousand Splendid Suns Book Club Discussion Questions 1 and 2
    By Katybird in forum Leisure & Media Arts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-24-2007, 08:18 PM
  3. September's Book Club Read: A Thousand Splendid Suns
    By bibliomane in forum Leisure & Media Arts
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-05-2007, 06:03 PM
  4. Splendid Delites Sugar-free desserts
    By kmamaral in forum Freebies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-07-2007, 01:09 PM
  5. splenda?
    By Sara Noel in forum Health and beauty
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-10-2003, 08:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •