Joined
·
9,397 Posts
My inlaws announced about a month ago that they wanted to put both dh and I on their checking accounts. I am added also because they know dh has never done any budgeting or bills and if they need help it will be me doing it. I told them I thought they should just draw up the papers with an attorney to give dh financial power of attorney if/when it is needed.
They are responsible people financially so there is not a worry of them bouncing checks etc. Is there more to this than I am seeing? From research we are ok doing this unless there is a biggie I am missing.
Here is another side of this and I told the inlaws they need too see an attorney because I see a big tax problem, with this for us! Their home is paid for. They want to give it to dh to avoid losing it if they run out of $. First I personally feel it is unethical. Second upon both of their death the house would be sold and split with dh's siblings. I see a very huge tax nightmare.
I believe dh would be taxed big time on capitol gains as it has appreciated 5 fold and we would not live there. Then there would be gift taxes when it was split with his siblings. It also would affect our kids being able to qualify for college loans etc as it would look like we have a second property that is quite valuable.
I'm not at all up on this kind of stuff but I told dh this is a terrible idea and in no way to do this until we all see an attorney together. MIL thought the whole problem could be avoided by then putting it in all her childrens names. NO I dont think so.
For the records my inlaws are in their early 60's and healthy. Their retirement income is quite generous and they would never qualify for medicade for nursing home care. I strongly encouraged them to buy long term care insurance and have the attorney discuss trusts with them.
Ok villagers what do you think? Am I on base or way off????
They are responsible people financially so there is not a worry of them bouncing checks etc. Is there more to this than I am seeing? From research we are ok doing this unless there is a biggie I am missing.
Here is another side of this and I told the inlaws they need too see an attorney because I see a big tax problem, with this for us! Their home is paid for. They want to give it to dh to avoid losing it if they run out of $. First I personally feel it is unethical. Second upon both of their death the house would be sold and split with dh's siblings. I see a very huge tax nightmare.
I believe dh would be taxed big time on capitol gains as it has appreciated 5 fold and we would not live there. Then there would be gift taxes when it was split with his siblings. It also would affect our kids being able to qualify for college loans etc as it would look like we have a second property that is quite valuable.
I'm not at all up on this kind of stuff but I told dh this is a terrible idea and in no way to do this until we all see an attorney together. MIL thought the whole problem could be avoided by then putting it in all her childrens names. NO I dont think so.
For the records my inlaws are in their early 60's and healthy. Their retirement income is quite generous and they would never qualify for medicade for nursing home care. I strongly encouraged them to buy long term care insurance and have the attorney discuss trusts with them.
Ok villagers what do you think? Am I on base or way off????